February 25, 2024

HPAS/Allied Mains 2022 Answer Writing Challenge Day 13 : Model Answer

Question – “All empire-shaking challenges in India would have been made against the ruler who controlled Delhi, thus, giving Panipat an important role in the battle”. Elucidate the statement mentioning why so many battles were fought at Panipat. (20 marks 400 words)

Understanding of question: The statement is implying that in order to control the vast lands of India , Delhi should be under control of the ruler and almost all the major challenges which changed the empire regime in Indian history happened after the battle of Panipat were fought . Hence the reasons for choosing Panipat as battle ground are asked.   
   
IntroductionPanipat and its adjacent region, located in present Haryana on the banks of the Yamuna and between the fertile plains of the Ganga and Indus rivers, have witnessed several battles. These battles changed the course of Indian history at different points of time 
   
Keywords  
   
Main Body Empire Shaking Battles

a.      The first Battle of Panipat in 1526 was between Babur and Ibrahim Lodi. The result of the battle laid the foundation of the Mughal Empire by ending the rule of the Delhi Sultanate.

b.      The Second Battle of Panipat in 1556 was between Akbar and Hemu; it decided in favour of the continuation of the Mughal rule.

c.      The Third Battle of Panipat in 1761 between the Marathas and Ahmad Shah Abdali put an end to the Maratha ambition of ruling over India.

Why Panipat was a favourite battle field

A.    Panipat had a strategic location. One of the parties of the war generally came from the north/northwest through the Khyber Pass to get hold over Delhi, the political capital of northern India. To move a military through rough terrains—deserts of Rajasthan or the other northern areas infested with dense forests—was very risky and difficult. On the other hand, the rulers at Delhi considered Panipat as a confrontable strategic ground and hence they preferred to take the fight there.

B.     Its proximity to Delhi made it easier for the Indian rulers to transport weapons, military and food supplies etc., to the battleground, and still keep the capital insulated from the conflict at hand.

C.     Panipat’s surrounding region has a flat ground which was suitable for cavalry movement—the main mode of warfare at the time.

D.    After the construction of the Grand Trunk Road by Sher Shah Suri (1540-45), Panipat was on this route. It became easier for conquerors to find their way there.

E.     The duration of monsoon rainfall in the region is short in comparison to other areas making it easier to fight.

F.      The artisans/smiths of these regions were experts in making warfare-related materials and hence it became easier for forces of both parties to replenish their war materials.

 
   
Conclusion Therefore, we can say that all three Battles of Panipat have their own reasons and significance 
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

© 2024 Civilstap Himachal Design & Development